Analysis
Understanding what’s actually happening & why
It’s not the pest. It’s the program
Most persistent pest problems aren’t pest problems. They’re program problems, gaps in accountability, missed entry points, or activity patterns no one has connected across locations. The Analysis process starts by examining what the current program actually produces, not just what it says it produces.
What Analysis Covers:
Independent review of current pest provider reports, service notes, and device activity data
Facility walkthroughs focused on structural access points, high-pressure zones, and sanitation conditions
24/7 video surveillance in mechanical rooms, utility chases, ceilings, docks, and other risk areas
Site mapping of devices, pest pathways, and problem zones
Data review across locations to identify trends, repeat issues, and root causes
Current provider performance is assessed independently, with no existing contract or relationship to protect.
An independent analysis has no stake in the findings. No existing contract to protect, no service renewal to justify. The assessment reflects what’s actually happening, not what the current program is designed to report.
The full picture. No gaps.
An independent facility evaluation looks at the full picture: what conditions exist, how well the current program is documented, and where gaps could become findings on someone else’s timeline.
What the evaluation covers:
Written Inspection Report
A detailed written report covering interior and exterior conditions, pest identification, activity findings, structural vulnerabilities, and sanitation observations
Performance Summary
A plain-language assessment of what the current pest program is producing, catching, missing, and whether existing strategies are generating measurable results.
Accountability Map
A breakdown of where gaps exist among facility teams, custodial staff, and the current provider, and identifying exactly what tasks are falling through the cracks and where.
Corrective Action Plan
A prioritized list of conditions, documentation gaps, and program deficiencies, so the facility knows what to address first, what can wait, and what needs to be assigned to whom.
Collaboration Summary
A set of recommendations for improving current provider performance, specific scope adjustments, and accountability expectations for the existing vendor.
Surveillance Findings
Video surveillance data and monitoring results from high-risk zones, including findings, activity patterns, and recommended next steps based on observations.
You already have the data. The question is: what is it actually telling you?
Most facilities already have data, service reports, device activity logs, and portal summaries. What’s often missing is an independent read of what that data actually means. An outside analysis looks at the full picture without a stake in the outcome: what the current program is catching, what it’s missing, where accountability breaks down, and what conditions are being left unaddressed. The findings reflect reality, not the program’s best version of it.
